How far is it from symbol to phenomenon to reality?

 Writing is really hard. Writing is much easier. I learned to write after the first grade of elementary school. The first 50 years did not make me understand writing as a profession, and the next 50 years cannot guarantee that I can understand what writing is and what writing is. Writing is really too simple. But, do you write? Do you know how to write? What words have you written?

The advantages and focus of tradition are paradigm tracks and fields, not things themselves. And the challengers of tradition just challenge the part that they are offended by, that is, the things themselves, and have nothing to do with the overall situation and ecology, and the historical process and historical significance. At least, it is not what they want to pay attention to and care about.

Is reasonable use a technical problem? Or a problem of ability? Or a combination of the two? Saving means using less or not using, maybe water and electricity, maybe money, the effect of things, and a series of effects of a series of things are not what he pays attention to and cares about. But why has saving become a behavior with strong moral attributes? Does saving mean not using it if you can, and using less if you can? The starting point is not to care about the economy, the flow of energy, the time cost and time efficiency, the psychological feelings and psychological costs, and the resulting impact on production efficiency and the happiness index. Why is its moral score naturally high? What kind of ability does saving bring about in people? What kind of character does saving bring about in people's lives? --More respect for the material world? More care for yourself? More respect and compassion for others? Better at making money?

Wealth is a culture, and poverty is also a culture. The meaning of culture in the sense of psychology and sociology is the implicit and explicit rules that are commonly accepted. People always pursue and avoid something consciously or unconsciously. They may not think, and may not be able to think. The so-called reflection is not only a matter of attitude, but also a matter of ability, especially a matter of resources. Resources mean not only what you have, but also what your living environment has, what your family and friends have, and what you read. Otherwise, reflection is just the beginning of regret, a long sigh of the straw hat of the literary youth.

As a science, psychology is very particular about hypothesis observation and verification. Double-blind experiments are also adopted as much as possible. It's just that the deduction of psychological theorems involves too many changes in factors, so it has become a family of metaphysics in the entertainment of non-professionals.

Then what?

This is a feminine communication posture, which is suitable for women and guys

What to do?

This is a masculine conversation style. Be straightforward, face things, and solve problems. Talk about mood after that.

If things don't get better, your mood can't really get better.

Talk about mood first, then talk about things. It's good, but the Trojan horse may not give you a chance.

从符号到现象再到实在有多远

写作真的是很难。写字就好多了，小学一年级之后，我就会写字了。前一个50年没有能使我理解写作这件事这个职业，后一个50年也无法保证我能理解什么是写作什么才是写作。写字真的太简单了。只是，你写吗？你会去写吗？你都写了些什么字呢？

传统的优势和重点是范式轨道和领域，而不是事情本身。而传统的挑战者恰好挑战的仅仅是自己被冒犯的部分，即事情本身，而与大局与生态，与历史的进程历史的意义没有太相关。至少，不是他们要关注的和在意的。

合理利用是技术问题？还是能力问题？还是二者的综合？节约就是少用或不用，也许是水电，也许是钱财，事情的效果，以及一系列事情的一系列效果不是他关注的和关心的。可是，凭什么节约成了道德属性很强的行为呢？节约的意思是不是能不用就不用，能少用就少用----其出发点不关心经济，不关心能量的流动，不关心时间成本和时间的效率，也不关心心理感受和心理成本，以及由此而产生的对生产效率的影响，对幸福指数的影响。那它的道德起评分为什么天生就高呢？节约造就了人哪方面的能力？节约造就了人的生命中哪一种品格？--对物质界更尊重？对自己更爱惜？对他人更会尊重和怜悯？更会赚钱？

富足是一种文化，穷乏也是一种文化。文化在心理学和社会学意义上的含义就是约定俗成的潜规则和显规则。人们总是有意识或无意识地追求什么和回避什么。未必去思考，未必能思考。所谓反省反思，不只是一个态度的事情，更是一个能力的事情，尤其是一个资源的事情。资源的意思不仅是你有什么，还包括你生存的环境有什么，你的家人朋友有什么，你阅读的东西里有什么。不然，反思不过后悔的开始，一声长叹的文艺青年的草帽。

心理学作为一种科学，是很讲究假设观察和验证的。双盲实验也是尽可能采用的。只是心理学的定理演绎涉及太多要素的变化，以至于在业外人士的娱乐中变成了玄学一家子了。

然后呢？

这是一个阴性的交流姿态，便女性，也有guy

怎么办？

这是一个阳刚味的对话风格。直来直去，面对事情，解决问题。完了再谈心情。

事情好不了，心情不可能真的好。

先谈心情，后谈事情。好是好，只是特洛伊木马未必给机会。